Annual Reports

For the first time, part of the content is presented in digital format, allowing for expanded textual content and, above all, a greater number of images and graphics. 

The so-called contemporary or post-restructuring reports produced between 1986 and 2002 reflect an effort to systematise content along two main lines: first, the achievement of results, and second, bringing the institution closer to citizens. From 1993 onwards, the basic structure of the reports focuses on scientific programming, technical and/or support centres, and what is referred to as scientific outreach, as a means of connecting with the public. Another aspect that gains prominence is international scientific cooperation, alongside a continued emphasis on the funding of scientific activity.

These reports take on a more outreach-oriented character, aiming to involve society in scientific activity. This period recognises the complexity and large number of centres within the Council, acknowledging that it is impossible to provide exhaustive information on all activities. Instead, readers are referred to the individual reports of each centre for detailed annual achievements. The work carried out by the centres is summarised in brief outlines of their research activities. The reports primarily focus on resource management and the scope of that management.

In the second half of the 1960s, the Reports underwent a significant structural shift. They evolved from being conceived as historical annual reports to becoming statistical annual reports. Individual research activities moved into the background, while emphasis was placed on collective work, group research lines, and, ultimately, the overall research policy. Quantitative data took precedence over the description of individual contributions, which became subsumed within statistical figures. This period is also marked by a clear influence of UNESCO, adopting its organisation and systematisation of scientific fields and areas of knowledge, reflecting the CSIC’s intention to fully integrate into the international scientific community.

In the early years of the CSIC, the guidelines for drafting reports allowed centres a certain degree of flexibility in terms of format and length. This led to considerable heterogeneity in the information provided which, while greatly enriching the account of the activities carried out, also resulted in significant disparities in the level of detail across different centres.